Barristers’ Attire: The Tradition of Wearing Wigs Examined

Introduction:

Barristers are known for their distinctive attire, which includes a black robe, white collar, and a wig. This traditional dress code has been a part of the legal profession for centuries and is still followed by many countries around the world. While the legal profession has evolved over time, the tradition of wearing wigs has remained a constant. In this article, we will examine the history and significance of barristers’ wigs, the reasons behind their use, and whether this tradition has a place in modern-day legal practice.

The Historical Significance of Barristers’ Wigs: A Brief Overview

Barristers’ wigs have been a symbol of legal professionalism for centuries. The use of wigs dates back to the 16th century when judges and lawyers began to wear them in court.

Wigs were initially worn by judges and lawyers to indicate their position and authority in court. They were a sign of respectability and professionalism, and they helped to distinguish lawyers from the general public.

In the 18th century, the use of wigs became more widespread among barristers and judges in the UK. The wigs were made of white horsehair and were often worn with black robes.

The use of wigs in court was not just a matter of tradition and fashion, but it also had practical reasons. In the past, wigs helped to keep the head cool in the summer months when courtrooms were often crowded and stuffy. They also helped to keep the head warm in the winter months when courtrooms could be chilly.

Today, barristers’ wigs are still worn in some countries, including the UK, Canada, and Australia. However, their use has become less widespread and they are no longer required in many courts.

Despite their decreasing popularity, the use of barristers’ wigs remains an important part of legal history and tradition. They are a symbol of the legal profession and the authority of the court.

• Barristers’ wigs were initially worn by judges and lawyers to indicate their position and authority in court.
• The use of wigs in court was not just a matter of tradition and fashion, but it also had practical reasons.
• Today, barristers’ wigs are still worn in some countries, including the UK, Canada, and Australia.
• The use of barristers’ wigs remains an important part of legal history and tradition.

For example: In the UK, barristers’ wigs are still worn in some courts, particularly in higher courts such as the High Court and the Crown Court. They are also worn during ceremonial occasions such as the annual opening of the legal year.

The Historical and Cultural Significance of Wearing Wigs in the United States Legal System.

Wearing wigs in the United States legal system dates back to the 18th century and is rooted in British tradition. During this time period, wigs were a symbol of wealth and status, and were worn by judges and barristers in court as a way to project an image of authority and knowledge.

Although the tradition of wearing wigs in the legal profession has largely fallen out of practice in the UK, the custom has persisted in the United States. Today, wigs are still worn by judges and lawyers in some state and federal courts, particularly in ceremonial or formal settings.

The use of wigs in the legal system can also be seen as a nod to the history of the American legal system and its roots in English common law. By wearing wigs, judges and lawyers are paying homage to the legal traditions that formed the foundation of the American legal system.

While the use of wigs in the legal profession has largely become symbolic, there are some practical reasons for their use as well. Wigs can help to create a sense of anonymity, which can be helpful in high-profile cases where judges or lawyers may be at risk of personal harm. Additionally, wigs can help to create a sense of formality and decorum in the courtroom.

However, not all legal professionals believe that the tradition of wearing wigs is necessary or relevant in modern times. Some argue that the use of wigs is outdated and unnecessary, and that legal professionals should focus on projecting authority and knowledge through their words and actions, rather than through their appearance.

Ultimately, the decision to wear a wig in court is a personal one for each judge or lawyer. While the tradition of wearing wigs in the legal profession may have lost some of its practical significance over the years, it remains an important symbol of the history and culture of the American legal system.

Examples of Courts where Wigs are Worn

• The Supreme Court of the United States
• The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
• The United States Court of Federal Claims
• The United States Tax Court
• The United States Court of International Trade

The Historical and Cultural Significance of Wigs Worn by British Lawyers and Judges in Courtrooms

Wigs worn by British lawyers and judges in courtrooms are not just a fashion statement, but have a historical and cultural significance that dates back to the 17th century.

Origins of Wigs: The tradition of wearing wigs in the courtroom began in the 1600s when King Charles II started wearing them as a fashion statement. Soon, wigs became a symbol of wealth and status, and judges and lawyers began wearing them to appear more professional and respectable.

Types of Wigs: There are two types of wigs worn in British courtrooms: the full-bottomed wig and the half-bottomed wig. The full-bottomed wig is worn by judges and is made of horsehair, while the half-bottomed wig is worn by lawyers and is made of human hair.

Meaning behind Wigs: Wearing wigs in courtrooms represents tradition, respect, and formality. The wigs also serve as a symbol of impartiality, as they make everyone look similar and remove any personal biases or prejudices.

Controversy surrounding Wigs: In recent years, there has been controversy surrounding the use of wigs in British courtrooms. Some argue that they are outdated and unnecessary, while others believe that they are an important part of British legal culture. In 2007, the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales announced that wigs would no longer be mandatory for civil and family court judges, but they would still be worn in criminal cases.

Conclusion: Wigs may seem like a trivial accessory, but they hold a significant place in British legal history and culture. They represent tradition, formality, and impartiality, and continue to be a symbol of the British legal system.

Example:

During a courtroom trial, the judge entered wearing a full-bottomed wig, while the lawyers were wearing half-bottomed wigs. The wigs added to the formality of the proceedings and made everyone appear professional and equal.

Interesting facts:

• The wigs can cost anywhere from £500 to £2,000.
• The full-bottomed wigs can weigh up to 2 pounds.
• Queen Elizabeth II still wears a wig during the State Opening of Parliament.

The Historical Significance of the British Wig-Wearing Tradition in the 1700s: An In-Depth Analysis

The 1700s were a time of great change in Britain, with revolutions in politics, industry, and fashion. One of the most iconic fashion trends of the time was the wearing of wigs, particularly by men of high social status.

Wigs were not a new invention in the 1700s, but they became increasingly popular and elaborate during this time period. The trend began in the late 1600s, when King Louis XIV of France started wearing wigs to conceal his baldness. The fashion quickly spread to other European countries, including Britain.

Wigs served several purposes in 1700s Britain. One of the main reasons was to indicate social status. The more elaborate and expensive the wig, the higher the wearer’s social standing. Wigs were also worn to indicate a profession, with judges and lawyers wearing specific styles of wigs to distinguish themselves in court.

Another reason for the popularity of wigs was hygiene. At the time, bathing was not a common practice, and wigs were a way for people to cover up unwashed hair. Wigs were often made of human hair, which was considered more hygienic than wearing one’s own unwashed hair.

The wig-wearing tradition in the 1700s also had political significance. Many members of the British aristocracy were supporters of the monarchy, and wearing a wig was a way to show loyalty to the king. Wigs were also worn by members of the Whig political party, which supported the power of Parliament over the monarchy.

Overall, the wig-wearing tradition in 1700s Britain was a reflection of the complex social, cultural, and political changes of the time. While wigs are no longer a popular fashion trend, their historical significance can still be seen today in legal and ceremonial settings, where wigs are still worn as a symbol of tradition and authority.

Examples of Wig Styles in the 1700s:

• Full-bottomed wig: A large wig that covered the back and shoulders, often worn by judges and lawyers in court.
• Powdered wig: A wig that was coated in powder to give it a white or off-white color.
• Curl wig: A wig with tightly curled hair, often worn by men of high social status.
• Patch wig: A wig that had a small patch of hair on top, often worn by military officers.